Post by kailync on Sept 14, 2008 19:52:15 GMT -5
When Hammurabi was king of Babylon he developed a law code called the Hammurabi Code. This law code was the basis of the phrase “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. I believe that Hammurabi’s idea of justice was correct. If someone strikes another I believe that person has every right to strike back .If someone is provoked the person who has provoked him or her should have to learn the error of their ways. However, I believe the person who was struck or provoked first should only take revenge in a way that is equally as malicious as what they were dealt. In the novel Nineteen Minutes a boy by the name of Peter Houghton was teased and excluded all his life and one day he takes a stand. Peter kills 10 students at Sterling High the high school which he attends. I do not think this was a just revenge. I believe the worst thing you can do is take a human life. The phrase is an eye for an eye not an eye for a life. What Peter did was extremely wrong, there were other ways he could have taken revenge; other ways that would have made him come out to be the better person. What I don’t understand about Peter’s case is why no one tried to help him, nobody told the bullies to stop. When a person sees something that is morally wrong they should do something about it. Sadly, many people don’t, and unfortunately nobody tried to help Peter, or comfort him. The fact that nobody did anything might be the reason he snapped. To think that lives may have been saved if someone had tried to help him just completely blows my mind. I think it is a moral obligation to help or comfort someone who has been wronged.